On Friday, July 19, the International! Court of Justice (ICJ) issued a ruling on the legal status of the Israeli occupation !at the request of the United Nations General Assembly. The judges recognized the illegal! nature of the occupation of Palestinian territories and called on Israel to “put an end to its presence as soon as possible.”
The latter deliberated for 5 months following
he hearings that took place last February. The ICJ heard opinions on two questions! from 19 to 26 February: the legal consequences of Israel’s continuing! violation of Palestinian territory; its impact on the status of the south africa phone number library occupation; and its repercussions for all States and the United Nations.
Before the February hearings began, the Israel! state warned that it would not recognize “the legitimacy of the discussion” at the ICJ. It described this move, initiated by the State of Palestine at the UN, as “part of the Palestinian attempt to dictate the outcome of the political settlement of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict without negotiation.”
The Israeli state refused to participate in the hearings and preferred to submit a written statement. In total, 52 countries submitted their opinions, the vast majority of which concluded that the Israeli occupation is illegal and asked the ICJ to declare it as such.
A landmark decision
This advisory opinion is the result of a specific request by the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA). It takes into account the rules and principles of international humanitarian law, international human rights aspects of your email including layout links law, relevant resolutions of the Security Council and the Human Rights Council, as well as those of the International Court of Justice.
This is the first time that the ICJ has ruled on the illegality of the 57- alb directory year-old occupation. The advisory opinion was conducted by ICJ President and Judge Salam. The Court confirmed that the questions referred by the UNGA are indeed of a legal nature and therefore not political. Thus, it is competent to issue an opinion and has sufficient information.