The Manhattan Project is also fascinating because! despite its devastating outcome! it demonstrated what humans are capable of when immense brainpower is combined with existential fear – in this case! the fear that Hitler could have reduced the world to rubble. Equally fascinating is how many small steps were necessary for success. For example! if Enrico Fermi had not succeeded in calculating the critical mass! others would not have been able to continue their work. In this context! each person bears an individual share of responsibility. Much marketing for ecommerce proven strategies with climate change! where the responsibility is divided among billions of people! including development and research institutions.
You approach this debate from a philosophical perspective.
Rachewiltz: In philosophy of science! we are interested in what makes science science: how it functions! whether and this course offers a detailed it can produce reliable knowledge. As a subfield of philosophy of science! ethics of science deals with the practice of science. It provides guidance and orientation for moral questions within and outside of research. A classic internal issue would be the misrepresentation of research results. On the other hand! the possible consequences of the CRISPR/Cas method! colloquially known as the ‘gene editors’! would be an external issue.
And who is responsible for ethics of science now?
Rachewiltz: Aside from the commissions at universities or research institutions! hardly czechia businesses directory is responsible. Although some philosophers try to bring the topic to the public! real discussions often only arise afterward. Dolly! the cloned sheep! is presented to the public – only then is cloning and the ethical concerns about it publicly debated. However! most of the ethical considerations have already been addressed in the fields of medical and bioethics! yet they garnered little interest.
We face a similar issue with climate change. Climate ethics is clear! but until the effects are felt personally! not much will change. According to evolutionary psychology! humans – with smoking being the best example – are simply extremely poor at assessing long-term risks that develop gradually. With a bomb! it’s different. This danger is immediately recognizable. Ethics of science thus often has an educational function for the future similar problems! and moral dilemmas.
“Artificial intelligence is currently one of the most controversial topics being discussed.”